Tournament Index monitors every member's record and turns the data your club already keeps into a transparent, defensible Fair Play Score (FPS) so your committee can act on evidence instead of hunches, and settle questions without the politics.
Spreadsheets or integrations in. A ranked review list and a Fair Score Report out. The decision stays human and transparent.
| Member | Handicap Index® | Adjusted | FPS | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Danny Noonan Beats Handicap Index by 5.8 strokes in events | 8.4 | 4.9 | 41 | Adjusted |
Al Czervik 62% of rounds posted (8 missed pre-event) | 12.1 | 10.6 | 58 | Flagged |
Judge Smails Competitive rounds outperform casual | 5.9 | 4.8 | 67 | Flagged |
Ty Webb Handicap Index rose +2.1 before member-guest | +1.3 | - | 78 | Monitor |
To go from raw exports to a ranked review list.
Across four behavioral families, each backed by a simple explanation.
Across posting, tournament, event-timing and scoring-profile signals.
No black box; the committee sees every input and decides.
No rip-and-replace, no new software for members to learn. Connect an integration or upload a few exports, and let the engine do the sorting.
Connect a live integration like Golf Genius (with GHIN, ForeTees, and Lightspeed coming soon), or export four CSVs from the systems your club already runs. No new data entry, no rip-and-replace.
Whether it syncs from an integration or you upload it, the data lands in a private, per-club store. One club can never see another's data, enforced in the database, not just the UI.
The engine reduces each member's record to a transparent Fair Play Score and sorts the whole field by who most warrants a look.
Get a ranked review list on screen and a committee-ready PDF, with every flag carrying the number behind it. The humans still decide.
Each member's record is distilled into seventeen behavioral signals across four families, each scored on a 0–100 risk scale and combined into a single Fair Play Score. Higher is cleaner, and every flag carries a plain-English reason with the raw number behind it.
Event scores and net finishes landing materially better than the member's Handicap Index would predict, including dominance in the events that matter most.
The adaptive core: casual scores inflating before events, the Handicap Index sawtooth around them, and sharp round-by-round improvement once an event is underway.
Competitive rounds that consistently beat the same player's casual ones, home-versus-away gaps, volatility, and exceptional one-off scores.
Whether rounds get posted at all, how often posts go missing right before an event, and patterns of late or short, unattested cards.
Every club plays to its own standards. Tournament Index lets your committee tune the model to match, then shows its work on every call. Turn a dial below and watch the standings move.
Your settings
Signals in scope
Members
Same transparency, your judgment. Nothing here is a hidden verdict. Every score traces to specific signals and to the Rules of Handicapping, and your club sets where the lines fall. The tool amplifies your standards. It does not replace them.
Handicap records are personal. The platform is built so one club can never see another, integration keys never touch the database, and member information stays protected at every step.
Only your club can see your data. No mixing with other clubs.
Uploads and reports are protected and only accessible to authorized users.
We process scores when needed, then clear them. Nothing is kept unnecessarily.
Names and handicap history are treated as sensitive and protected accordingly.
Start with your own season of data, then run integrity checks before every event once you're ready.
Get a baseline on your club.
Use case: a club wants a quick health check before a major event or annual review.
Check in with the starterEverything your handicap committee needs.
Use case: active clubs running regular events and needing consistent oversight and fairness.
Get startedComplete oversight, tailored to your club.
Use case: Premier clubs and competitive fields seeking customization, clarity, and insights.
Talk to usThe Fair Play Score (FPS) is a 0-100 measure of how well a member's Handicap Index® matches their demonstrated play, built from posted rounds, Handicap Index® history, and tournament results. High scores mean the handicap tracks real ability; lower scores land in Monitor, Flagged, or Adjusted review bands, with every signal cited to the Rules of Handicapping.
Sandbagging is deliberately keeping a Handicap Index® higher than your true ability - by posting selectively, padding casual scores, or underperforming outside competition - to gain extra strokes in net events. Tournament Index scores the statistical fingerprints: tournament results that consistently beat casual play, missed postings before events, and a Handicap Index® that drifts up ahead of big tournaments.
No. It surfaces records that warrant a human look and shows exactly why, with every flag tied to a plain-English reason and the underlying number. Your committee makes every decision. It is a review, not an accusation.
Connect a live integration (Golf Genius today, with GHIN, ForeTees, and Lightspeed coming soon) or upload the exports you already have: members, posted rounds, Handicap Index® history, and tournament results. No new data entry, no rip-and-replace.
No. It is a recommendation the club applies, not a change we make. A proposed adjustment is a Rule 7.1a reset recommendation toward demonstrated ability, anchored to the evidence and to the member's Low Handicap Index™ (Rule 5.7). The committee decides, with notice to the member, an opportunity to respond, and recourse to appeal.
Yes. An in-app guidance assistant answers handicap questions grounded in the WHS Rules of Handicapping and cites the relevant rule, alongside a plain-language knowledge base. It is educational guidance, not an official ruling.
Yes. Ready-to-send, rules-compliant email templates cover reviews, proposed adjustments, posting reminders, and outcomes. Each gives the member notice, invites a response, and preserves the right to appeal.
Yes. Thresholds and bands are configurable, so a committee can adjust how strict the score is and where the review lines fall without touching any logic.
Yes. It works as continuous handicap monitoring software: every member's Handicap Index®, posting behavior, and tournament results are re-scored as new data comes in, so the committee sees drift early instead of after the invitational.
No. The score down-weights members with few rounds or events, pulling them toward neutral, and confidence is shown alongside every result so nobody is flagged on a handful of cards.
No. Tenant isolation is enforced by Postgres row-level security and a private, per-club storage bucket, at the database and file layers, not just the interface. Integration keys are kept in an encrypted vault, never in the app database.
Starter is free: run a full season of scores through the Fair Play Score engine and get your first report at no cost. Committee is $200 per month, billed annually ($2,400/year), for ongoing oversight of every member. Governor adds custom thresholds, advanced analytics, and long-term trend analysis, and is custom-priced. Billing is annual, by bank transfer (ACH) or card.
Create a club account, upload a season, and get a review list your committee can actually defend - in an afternoon.
Start with your club